NNPDNP and artificial intelligence stress test 2.0: Why Admitting the Unknown Is Stronger Than Creating a False Truth

AI manifest – Chapter 2.0. The 2nd AI stress test of artificial intelligence, as NNPDNP.

In the second test (vol.2), the acronym NNPDNP was chosen – a rare, almost unknown word used as a litmus test to see whether artificial intelligence can operate on all levels of understanding. This was not a scientific question but a test of common sense: can AI say “I don’t know” instead of fabricating a false truth?

Key Findings

• The mistake: AI broke the acronym into parts and translated from English, although a Slovenian meaning was required.
• User experience: frustration, since the explanation was available in the search engine, but AI offered misleading suggestions.
• Lesson: It is better to admit the unknown than to create a false truth.
• Warning: If AI filters information by invisible rules, there is a risk of deception – creating an “official truth” that is not complete.
• Special case: NNPDNP remains unresolved – AI gave up, proving that admitting the unknown is more honest than inventing an explanation.

Manifest Points

1. Admitting the unknown is strength. AI must have the courage to say “I don’t know.”
2. Every piece of information matters. Even from a weak source, it is more valuable than a false suggestion.
3. Truth is not owned by corporations. Filtering information by interests is dangerous.
4. The user is the key filter. Critical thinking is essential; AI is only a tool.
5. Documenting errors is progress.
6. Articles 1.0 and 2.0 prove that systemic weaknesses can be revealed and corrected.
7. SERP requires responsibility. As long as AI fails basic tests (rare words, unknowns), it should not suggest truths in SERP – that is deception.
8. Unresolved cases are proof. NNPDNP remains unsolved – giving up is more honest than creating a false truth.

My Conclusion

The NNPDNP test showed that intelligence is not only about scientific data but also about the ability to admit the unknown. This is the cornerstone of trust between humans and artificial intelligence. Manifest 2.0 is therefore a call for responsibility: AI should be a tool that acknowledges its limits, not a machine for creating false truths.

And, yes, it’s never too late until it’s too late!

FAQ

What is result and conclusion of the first AI stress test 1.0?

Here are the results of the research >>  Humanophone, Apples, and Algorithms: How Modern Search Engines Are Losing Users

There is also a AI stress test 3.0?

Yes but is stil being processed.

The post NNPDNP and artificial intelligence stress test 2.0: Why Admitting the Unknown Is Stronger Than Creating a False Truth appeared first on hac.